Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Romero v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2026cv05225
Defendant:
Diana Rivas, Eric Anthony Hendrix, Unknown Hendrix and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vasquez Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13404
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dari v. Chan et al
as 1:2026cv04483
Plaintiff:
Nadine Dari
Defendant:
Wing F Chan, Anthony Sica, Joseph Antonio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony v. The Guardian
as 2:2026cv01582
Plaintiff:
Raymond P. Anthony
Defendant:
The Guardian
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv03037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
LoRusso v. Warden, Pinellas County Jail (Pinellas County)
as 8:2026cv02130
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony LoRusso
Respondent:
Warden, Pinellas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Love v. Lake County, Illinois et al
as 1:2026cv08774
Plaintiff:
Anthony M Love
Defendant:
Lake County, Illinois, Sheriff John Idleburg, Wellpath LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Powell v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv05876
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Powell
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, Al Joron Ibrahim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.