Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-20588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carlton Parks v. USA, et al
as 26-5897
Plaintiff:
CARLTON B. PARKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY S. SUTTON, Senior Circuit Judge, Judicial Official, TRAVIS RANDALL MCDONOUGH, Judicial Official and others
James Murzike v. B. McKinney, et al
as 26-13541
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
B. MCKINNEY, BURNETTE, SECULES and others
Stabbs v. St. Louis County, Minnesota et al
as 0:2026cv04205
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lynn Stabbs
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Minnesota, Deputy Gavin Nichols, Sergeant Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burnett v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00315
Plaintiff:
Robert Burnett
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Burchett v. Barnett et al
as 1:2026cv00174
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edward Burchett
Defendant:
Teresa Barnett, Tim Burnett and Troy Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Connecticut Department of Children and Families et al
as 3:2026cv01673
Plaintiff:
D. Smith
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Children and Families, Juanita S. Taylor, Lisa Burnett Beaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Delahoussaye et al
as 2:2026cv02170
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Taylor
Defendant:
Kevin Delahoussaye, Tonika Jackson-Smart and Donna Burnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Burnett v. Federal Express Corporation
as 8:2026cv02777
Plaintiff:
Michael Burnett
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
