Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,906
USA v. Barrow
as 24-10159
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Joshua Devon Barrow
Transource Pennsylvania LLC v. Steven DeFrank, et al
as 24-1045
Plaintiff: TRANSOURCE PENNSYLVANIA LLC
Defendant: STEVEN M. DEFRANK, Chairman, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, KIMBERLY M. BARROW, Vice Chairman, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, JOHN F. COLEMAN, JR., Commissioner, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, in his official capacity and others
Barrows et al v. Humana, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00654
Plaintiff: JoAnne Barrows and Susan Hagood
Defendant: Humana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Type: Contract Insurance
USA v. Barrow
as 24-10100
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Mandis Charles Barrow
USA v. Barrow
as 24-10102
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Mandis Charles Barrow, Twin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01542
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff: Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant: Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
SCOTT et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00315
Plaintiff: EARNEST SCOTT, JR. and CHRISTOPHER JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL R. HARRY, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01736
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15903
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?