Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Hall et al v. Bollinger et al
as 3:2008cv01202
Plaintiff:
Clarence Hall, Solathus M Johnson and Edwin E Locklayer
Defendant:
Gene Bollinger, Gerald Jones and Southern Health Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HALL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv04136
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE HALL, RORY HILL, JOHN DENNY and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Willis v. McFarland et al
as 4:2008cv00795
Plaintiff:
Damon Willis
Defendant:
Scott McFarland, Clarence Hall, Anthony Kirkhart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. Quarterman
as 08-10395
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE HALL
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
HALL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2008cv00558
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE HALL, RORY HILL, JOHN DENNY and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hall v. Ouachita Parish
as 3:2007cv02187
Plaintiff:
Danny Clarence Hall
Defendant:
Correctional Center Ouachita Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hall v. UTMB et al
as 6:2007cv00416
Plaintiff:
Melvin Clarence Hall
Defendant:
UTMB, Virginia Shafer, Virginia. Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Quarterman
as 5:2007cv00166
Petitioner:
Clarence Hall
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Quarterman
as 6:2007cv00228
Petitioner:
Clarence Hall
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willis v. McFarland et al
as 4:2007cv00686
Plaintiff:
Damon Willis
Defendant:
Scott McFarland, Scott McFarland, Clarence Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
