Cases 21 - 30 of 250
Cole v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00523
Petitioner:
Charles Allen Cole, III
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FARMER v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2021cv03120
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALLEN FARMER, JR
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL and ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02003
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Allen Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Bludworth, et al
as 6:2021cv00026
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Montana and Pete Bludworth
Petitioner:
Charles Allen Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Richards v. Bradley Kinkade, et al
as 21-1651
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Dean Huppert, Jeff Wright, Bret Lucas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Allen Richards
Allen v. Hendricks et al
as 1:2021cv00650
Defendant:
Sgt. Doe, Officer Jegede, Officer Maurry and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rodgers v. Allen et al
as 4:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Charles Allen, L Nelson and T Reed
Plaintiff:
Dalon V Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grady v. Allen et al
as 4:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Charles Allen, Richard Murphy, Tomisee and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Grady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
