Cases 21 - 30 of 2,459
Wright v. USA
as 3:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Charles R. Wright
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Tomko et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Tomko and Kathy Tomko
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vaughn v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq00081
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Vaughn
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Griffin v. Breed et al
as 2:2023cv02707
Plaintiff:
Janis Griffin and Griffin Family Trust as amended
Defendant:
Charles G Breed, Whitney V Breed, Charles R Breed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Ou-Young v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 3:2023cv06597
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Merrick B. Garland, Gregory J. Ahern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Walgreen Co. v. Walgreen Health Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv17067
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co.
Defendant:
Walgreen Health Solutions, LLC and Charles R. Walgreen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Evans v. Summit Hill Foods Inc
as 2:2023cv04149
Plaintiff:
Charles R Evans
Defendant:
Summit Hill Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Ware v. USA
as 8:2023cv00553
Petitioner:
Charles R. Ware
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
In Re: Charles R. Grefer
as 5:2023pf00005
In Re:
Charles R. Grefer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
