Cases 21 - 30 of 39,866
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL DAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, EMMANUEL AGBARA, INNOCENT OPARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell, et al v. Caruso Homes, Inc, et al
as 8:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Erica Bell
Defendant:
Xana Colvin, Carlos Colvin, Kymm Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Sanabria et al v. Goldman et al
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Ramirez Sanabria and Tia Joe Colvin Sanabria
Defendant:
Scott Alan Goldman and Dobbs Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Romano v. Brown
as 24-377
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROMANO
Defendant:
C.O. R. BROWN, Sergeant J. JONES, T. MILLER, DSP and others
Lee v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Sheila Lee
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, M O'hara, Officer Rodiguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colvin v. K.S.P.
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Lawaun Montez Colvin
Defendant:
K.S.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naylor v. Town of Rayville et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Nafeesa H Naylor
Defendant:
Town of Rayville, Officer Timothy L Colvin, Jeffery Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
