Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Wray v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10212
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arthur Wray, Jr.
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
USA v. Daniel Carter
as 18-35397
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL ARTHUR CARTER
Adams v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01628
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arthur Adams
Defendant:
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Daniel Heleva
as 17-3491
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL ARTHUR HELEVA
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONROE COUNTY
Nominal Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Carter v. USA
as 3:2016cv01196
Petitioner:
Daniel Arthur Carter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wolcott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv01115
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arthur Wolcott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Regan et al v. Charleston SC, City of
as 2:2013cv03046
Plaintiff:
James Regan , Jesse Faircloth , Michael Pack and others
Defendant:
Charleston SC, City of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. DOUGHERTY et al
as 2:2010cv07049
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. DOUGHERTY, DANIEL ARTHUR WHITAKER, ROSE MARIE CARBONARA and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Gutenkauf v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2010cv02129
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arthur Gutenkauf
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Hugh Hallman, Unknown Hallman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
