Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Taylor v. Blue et al.
as 2:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
Bonny Edward Taylor
Defendant:
Henry P. Hughes, Dianne Williams, Jean Brown and others
Petitioner:
Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edson v. McRae et al
as 0:2014cv62594
Plaintiff:
Steven August Edson
Defendant:
Victoria P. McRae, Jeannette G. Moran, Ernest Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 7:2014cv01841
Plaintiff:
Dianne Williams
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Bettis v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00881
Plaintiff:
Ronnie James Bettis
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks and Dianne Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv14113
Plaintiff:
Dianne Williams and Mark Williams
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv12044
Plaintiff:
Sharamaine Dianne Williams
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Austin's Affordable Autos, Inc.
as 3:2013cv05810
Plaintiff:
Diann Williams
Defendant:
Austin's Affordable Autos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Bailey v. Meeks, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00439
Plaintiff:
William Bailey
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes, Dr. McWatters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
