Cases 21 - 30 of 40
The Eichholz Law Firm, P.C. et al v. Jeff Martin & Associates, P.C. et al
as 4:2014cv00172
Plaintiff:
The Eichholz Law Firm, P.C. and David S. Eichholz
Defendant:
Jeff Martin & Associates, P.C. and Jeff Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Thompson v. English et al
as 2:2014cv02179
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Joe English , Paul Berge , Jeff Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00341
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Ibanez, Jr. et al v. Chase Bank et al
as 7:2013cv00293
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Ibanez, Jr. and Isabel Ibanez
Defendant:
Chase Bank , Monty Medly, Connie Medly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Howard v. White Bluff General Sessions Court et al
as 3:2013cv00549
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lynn Howard
Defendant:
White Bluff General Sessions Court, Carol Harmon and Jeff Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-15482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv05306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
COHN v. MAIN STREET FINANCIAL, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01352
Defendant:
JONATHON SCOTT ANSPACH, MAIN STREET FINANCIAL, INC. and JEFF MARTIN
Plaintiff:
ADAM COHN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. Martin et al
as 5:2012ct03111
Plaintiff:
Jeremy L. Jones
Defendant:
Jeff Martin, Terry Harris, Lt. Rowdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
