Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Van Meter v. Commonwealth of Virginia Child Support Enforcement et al
as 1:2017cv00892
Plaintiff:
Donald Van Meter
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia Child Support Enforcement, Francesca Gains and Kimberly Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson et al v. City of Douglasville, GA et al
as 1:2017cv00634
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wilson and Kimberly Wilson
Defendant:
City of Douglasville, GA, Coylee Danley, Andrew Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv00327
Plaintiff:
Brian Wilson and Kimberly Wilson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09554
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Wilson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUMMERLIN et al v. BAYER CORP. et al
as PAE/2:16-cv-03766
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SUMMERLIN , TERRI SUMMERVILLE , TARA SUTPHIN and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC. , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
SUMMERLIN et al v. BAYER CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv03766
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SUMMERLIN , TERRI SUMMERVILLE , TARA SUTPHIN and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC. , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv00858
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Wilson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILSON v. JOLI HAIR SALON IV, INC et al
as 3:2014cv30094
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY WILSON
Defendant:
JOLI HAIR SALON IV, INC and GIANFRANCO SANTANIELLO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pegasus Residential v. Wilson
as 1:2014cv01499
Plaintiff:
Pegasus Residential
Defendant:
Kimberly Wilson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WILSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2014cv01722
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
