Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Edwards et al v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
as 1:2016cv21224
Plaintiff:
Anthony R Edwards , Salvatore Capaccio , Gator Capital Management, LLC and others
Defendant:
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bailey v. Coffman et al
as 4:2015cv00968
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bailey
Defendant:
Britney Coffman, Matthew Reed, Christy Henson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Hair v. Winchester Police Department et al
as 5:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen O'Hair
Defendant:
Winchester Police Department , Clark County Sheriff's Office , Monty Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv03288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Conroy et al v. Caron et al
as 3:2014cv01180
Plaintiff:
Christine Conroy , Martin Conroy and Lauren Conroy
Defendant:
David A. Caron , Donald Bisi , Michael Furlong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRD et al v. REED et al
as 1:2014cv01072
Plaintiff:
DARLENE BYRD and JOHN A. BYRD
Defendant:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE and M. MATTHEW REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Byrnes et al
as 2:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed
Defendant:
Donna Byrnes, Garvin, Rebecca Dyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Fenske et al
as 2:2012cv01430
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed
Defendant:
Brian Fenske, Marc Lewis, Darrell O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield et al v. Manchester et al
as 3:2012cv00544
Plaintiff:
Arthur W. Schofield and Nancy Matthews
Defendant:
Town of Manchester , South Windsor Police Dept , Michael Magrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
