Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Manning v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02296
Plaintiff:
Michael Manning
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANNING v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv01086
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MANNING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawrence v. Zee et al
as 1:2016cv01515
Defendant:
John Does, Michael Manning and Tony Zee
Plaintiff:
David Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glen-Gery Corporation v. CDM Smith/Coakley Williams et al
as 1:2015cv01562
Plaintiff:
Glen-Gery Corporation
Defendant:
CDM Smith/Coakley Williams , CDM Smith Inc. , Coakley & Williams Construction Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Manning v. USA
as 4:2015cv01551
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Manning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Lamont William
as 15-1176
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAMONT WILLIAMS, a/k/a Michael Manning
Manning v. Sheriff et al
as 1:2014cv05731
Plaintiff:
Michael Manning
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 1:2014cv01226
Plaintiff:
Richard Adams , David Atzet , Derrico Aubrey and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund Brown, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Dickson et al
as 2:2014at00883
Plaintiff:
Richard Adams , David Atzet , Derrico Aubrey and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund Brown, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2014cv01657
Plaintiff:
Richard Adams , David Atzet , Derrico Aubrey and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund Brown, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
