Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Duffy v. Office Max North America, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00748
Plaintiff:
James Duffy
Defendant:
Office Max North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. Office Max et al
as 2:2013cv01255
Plaintiff:
Patricia Powell
Defendant:
Office Max, Anna Mae Halstensgaard, Briggs & Stratton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Milwaukee Journal et al
as 2:2013cv00566
Plaintiff:
John Jermaine Jackson and Loyalty J Inc
Defendant:
Milwaukee Journal and Office Max
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
True North Global Office Solutions v. Office Max, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00958
Plaintiff:
True North Global Office Solutions
Defendant:
Office Max, Inc., Tony Deschenes and Michigan Legislative Consultants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace Jones, Jr. v. Miami Dade Co. Consumer Protec
as 12-14434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALLACE C. JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MIAMI DADE CO. CONSUMER PROTECTION ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, Max Freiria - Badge #0355
Soverain Software LLC v. Oracle Corporation et al
as 6:2012cv00141
Plaintiff:
Soverain Software LLC
Defendant:
Oracle Corporation, Art Technology Group, LLC, Best Buy Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Davis v. Office Max et al
as 5:2011cv00111
Plaintiff:
Chakakhan Davis
Defendant:
Office Max and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Paul and Jacqueline Ruble Family Trust et al v. Office Max Inc et al
as 2:2011cv05424
Defendant:
Abisco Products Inc, Docupak Inc and Office Max Inc
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Ringbinder Inc and Paul and Jacqueline Ruble Family Trust
Heavrin v. Office Max, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00377
Plaintiff:
Brian Christopher Heavrin
Defendant:
Office Max, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
