Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Staton v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, John Bowen, Oullette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Kunz et al
as 6:2022cv01131
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Dale Martin, Sr
Defendant:
Officer Clark Addison Kunz, Fountain Inn Police Department SC, the and City of Fountain Inn SC, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Tremain Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snellings v. Supervisor Nichols et al
as 4:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Sidney Snellings
Defendant:
Supervisor Nichols, Montgomery County Sheriff's Office, Officer Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Alford Bradford v. Clark et al
as 2:2021cv09301
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Clark, D. Rendel and Steffan Weiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Head v. Asst. Warden Sample
as 21-7434
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HEAD
Defendant / Appellee:
ASSISTANT WARDEN SAMPLE, WARDEN J. R. BELL, S. EIRICH, Sis Officer and others
Clark v. Cook County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2021cv03093
Defendant:
Sheriff Dart, Cook County, Illinois, Officer Wicker and others
Plaintiff:
Josiah Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skinner v. Clark et al
as 5:2021cv00058
Defendant:
Officer Cushfield, Officer Cantrell, Powers and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Skinner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v May, et al.
as 1:2021cv00365
Defendant:
Officer Hansen, Lieutenant DeJesus, Warden Robert May and others
Plaintiff:
Judeau S. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
