Cases 21 - 30 of 10,290
Ramos v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv05960
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ramos
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lopez v. Prestige Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Bertha Lopez
Defendant:
Prestige Financial Services, Inc. and GMT Auto Sales, Inc. doing business as GMT Auto Sales-West
Cross Defendant:
Anastacio Humberto Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
RAMOS et al v. WALMART INC.
as 2:2024mc00026
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE RAMOS and EDWIN JOHNSON
Defendant:
WALMART INC.
Petitioner:
VANESSA TWYMAN
Howe #303244 v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
Charles Howe
Defendant:
Lupe Reyes, Christine Johnston, Catherine Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Crown Equipment Corporation
as 2:2024cv03881
Plaintiff:
Eli Ramos
Defendant:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Argueta Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2953
Petitioner:
SARA ESTER ARGUETA RAMOS, PAOLA SARAI RAMIREZ ARGUETA and BRENDA LIZETH HILARIO ARGUETA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos v. Almamlouh et al
as 1:2024cv01776
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Ramos
Defendant:
Healthy Way Organic Market LLC, Rafik Salem Almamlouh and Abdul Hamid Alzahere
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acevedo-Rodriguez v. Cuevas-Ramos
as 3:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Javier J. Acevedo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jose Luis Cuevas-Ramos, Carmen Ramona Natal-Perez, Edgardo Luis Cuevas-Natal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
