Cases 21 - 30 of 1,215
Ransom v. Gozola et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Petitioner:
Terrence Scott Ransom
Respondent:
Richard W Gozola and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Benton v. DePiero et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Lamar Benton
Defendant:
F. DePiero, J. Rawlings, P. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, STAFF: MR. BULLARDS, MR. RANSOME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. RANSOME A MALE NATIVE et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
DANIELL BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
RANSOME A MALE NATIVE, RANSOME MALE NATIVE SUBORDANT, MS. HARDGOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv04629
Plaintiff:
Laryssa M. Lee
Defendant:
Olivia Smith, Legacy Ransom and Kendra Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. GIBSON et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS BARNES
Defendant:
JAKAYLA GIBSON, RANSOM, A. SEGARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ransom v. McBee
as 4:2023cv00922
Petitioner:
Monique Ransom
Respondent:
Chris McBee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sammy Belle v. , et alIn re: Sammy Belle v. , et al
as 24-1125
Petitioner:
In re: SAMMY D. BELLE
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
BELLE v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
SAMMY D. BELLE
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM, LARRY KRASHNER and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
