Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Ratley v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv04024
Plaintiff:
Mark A Ratley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wood v. Vanliner Insurance Co et al
as 6:2016cv01575
Plaintiff:
Bernard Wood
Defendant:
Vanliner Insurance Co , New World Van Lines and Ratley B Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratley v. City of Troy et al
as 1:2016cv00650
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ratley
Defendant:
City of Troy , Dominick Comitale and Brandon Cipperly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Deal, Sr. v. Diann Hood
as 15-7009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANN RATLEY HOOD, C/O BLOND and MR. SOLOMON
Roger Deal, Sr. v. Beverly Perdue
as 15-6963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY PERDUE, DR. KENNETH PRICE, JR., WARDEN BARNES and others
Ratley et al v. Donald
as 4:2015cv01422
Plaintiff:
Nellie C Ratley and Amos Rudolph Ratley
Defendant:
Douglas W Donald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAL v. PERDUE et al
as 1:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
BEVERLY PERDUE, KENNETH PRICE, JR, BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratley v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv14588
Plaintiff:
Betty Ratley
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. , Fresenius USA, Inc. , FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv13752
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Taylor , Christopher Gavazzi , Cheryl Shelton and others
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care North America Inc., Fresenius U.S.A., Inc. , FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
