Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Winthrop Intelligence LLC et al v. Harvard Cider Company LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01910
Defendant:
Mark Finnegan, Harvard Cider Company LLC and Chase Brooks
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Brooks and Winthrop Intelligence LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Brooks v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv06752
Plaintiff:
Scott Brooks
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brook v. Owners Insurance Company
as 1:2017cv02530
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott Brook
Defendant:
Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Taylor v. Cairns et al
as 1:2016cv00354
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Taylor
Defendant:
Virginia C. Cairns, Pamela L. Lightvoet, Scott Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks et al v. Judd
as 2:2015cv00967
Plaintiff:
Scott Brooks and Devin Brooks
Defendant:
Jerry Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Baker v. Strider et al
as 3:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Don Baker
Defendant:
Clifford Royce Strider, III, Ric Abbott, Office of District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. EMPLOYEES et al
as 2:2013cv07158
Plaintiff:
GARY D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. EMPLOYEES, WILLIAMS SMINKEY, MIKE PECKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Strait, et al v. Belcan Engineering Group
as 12-8043
Petitioner:
MATTHEW STRAIT, for himself and on behalf of similarly situated others and SCOTT BROOKS
Respondent:
BELCAN ENGINEERING GROUP
Herbert v. Montgomery County, MD et al
as 8:2012cv01437
Plaintiff:
Daniel Herbert, Sr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County, MD , Roderick Stephens , Robert S. Sagona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
