Cases 21 - 30 of 6,113
Kennedy-Dumont et al v. Williams
as 3:2024cv30076
Plaintiff:
Stacey Kennedy-Dumont and Claude Dumont
Defendant:
Laura Williams
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Conley v. Dennard et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Natalie Conley
Defendant:
Brad Dennard, Michael DeWyre, Patty Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bey v. Carter-Haston et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Hanif Rahim Bey
Defendant:
Carter-Haston, Brownlee Whitlow & Praet, L. Marc Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. The Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv02604
Plaintiff:
Shemica Taylor
Defendant:
The Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois, David Haracz, Michael Forti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BECK v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv02297
Plaintiff:
STACEY MICHELLE BECK
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fantel v. Handley et al
as 3:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Jeremy Handley, Stacey O'Neil, Joseph H. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendoza v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Santos Gerardo Mendoza and Santos Gerardo Mendoza Castellon
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ross, Jailer McMores, Sergeant Heartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAMEYER v. GLOBAL CONNECTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT INC
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
STACEY LAMEYER
Defendant:
GLOBAL CONNECTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Reed v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Stacey Reed
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
