Cases 21 - 30 of 65
US v. Thomas Byrd
as 19-6625
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS MARSHALL BYRD
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kennedy v. Borough of Minersville Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2019cv00124
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Supreme Court of Pennsylania, Megan Brennan and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
KENNEDY v. PPL CORPORATION et al
as 5:2019cv00212
Defendant:
THOMAS MARSHALL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, DENNIS KOZE and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tidwell v. Calloway County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
David Tidwell
Defendant:
Deputy Jailer Sindy Bayles, Supervisor Slade McCuiston, Chief Deputy Dee Ann Benke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. JONES et al
as 5:2018cv03442
Defendant:
JOHN KOSKINEN, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, MICHAEL WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Garrett et al v Waupaca Foundry
as 1:2018cv01186
Plaintiff:
Darrell McCarthy, Jason Stallings, Thomas Marshall and others
Defendant:
Waupaca Foundry Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Charter School Capital Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02284
Defendant:
Charter School Capital Incorporated, Thomas Marshall, Hughes Collaborative Association and others
Plaintiff:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ADAMS et al v. WAUPACA FOUNDRY
as 3:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADAMS, JARED AHL, ERIC ALDERSON and others
Miscellaneou:
WILLIAM CARWILE, JR.
Defendant:
WAUPACA FOUNDRY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Robertson v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01411
Plaintiff:
Thomas Marshall Robertson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
