Cases 21 - 30 of 43
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Savedoff)
as 19-1391
Defendant:
Tina Brown, Julio Rodriguez, AKA Richard Rodriguez, AKA Richie Rodriguez and Gregory Gibbons
Defendant / Appellant:
Laurence Savedoff
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Brown v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01816
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tina Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown-El v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2018cv00857
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Tina Brown-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Brown et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2015cv04105
Plaintiff:
Tina Brown and Randy Brown
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Browne v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv11672
Plaintiff:
Tina Browne
Defendant:
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company , First Response Restoration LLC, John Doe Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhammad v. Pizza By Vito's
as 1:2014cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jihad Azim Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
Pizza By Vito's, LaRhonda Knight, Tina Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tina Brown-El v. Jeffrey Newton
as 14-6605
Petitioner - Appellant:
TINA BROWN-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFERY L. NEWTON
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Brown-El et al
as 3:2014cv00215
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Defendant:
Tina Brown-El and Salome Brown-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Browning, et al
as 2:2014cv12762
Petitioner:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Respondent:
Tina Browning and Dewey Foster
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
