Cases 31 - 40 of 1,734
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lombard Knapp Witt (PS) v. Bland et al
as 1:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombardi, Kiki Kenyatia Lombard Knapp W.H. and K. Kiki Lombard
Defendant:
303 West Colfax, 490 West Colfax, 520 West Colfax and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thompson v. RJD CF Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
David A. Thompson
Defendant:
RJD CF Warden, James S. Hill, L. Schobelock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Cowgill v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Despart v. Hoang Le et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Despart and Thomas Despart
Defendant:
Yen Hoang Le, Antoria Blanding and Dr. Yen Hoang Le
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bland v. State Farm Correctional Complex
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Wayne Maurice Bland
Defendant:
State Farm Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Bland v. Pfeiffer
as 1:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
Joshua Davis Bland
Respondent:
Christain Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Dev Bland
as 24-6096
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DEV VONTRAI BLAND, a/k/a Devon Trai Bland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
