Cases 31 - 40 of 3,658
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Forrest v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03502
Plaintiff:
Ariceli Forrest
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024ct03071
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Todd Ishee and Teresa O'Brian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forrester v. Dowdy et al
as 4:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jerry W Forrester
Defendant:
Dowdy, Howard, Nips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
LANA W. WALTERS and LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
T. BELLO, SALAJA, DEPUTY U and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smiley v. Floyd Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Forrest Smiley
Defendant:
Floyd Inc., Rocket Expediting LLC and Roger Bolton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
United States v. Randolph Forrest
as 24-1827
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Randolph Jay Forrest
Towery v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Patricia Forrester Towery
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
(PC) Kendrid v. Umana et al
as 2:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Forrest Kendrid
Defendant:
I. Umana and Biclar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forrest v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia)
as 6:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Taylor Forest and Taylor Forrest
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
