Cases 31 - 40 of 2,349
Ash, Davenell v. Superior Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Superior Police Dept., Judge Kelly Thimm, Prosecutor Chad Lalor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Mott et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Carrie Ash Mott, John Doe, The Joint Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Ash v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ash
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ash v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Rachel Johanna Ash
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ASH v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
JABBARI KEYON ASH, SR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenell Ash v. Duluth Police Dept., et al
as 24-1459
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Duluth Police Department and Minnesota State Patrol
Long v. West et al
as 9:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Christopher Long
Defendant:
Michelle West, Ashely Homes, Unknown Spangler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Entravision Communications Corporation
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Ash Newell
Defendant:
Entravision Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
