Cases 31 - 40 of 4,423
Fernandez et al
as 2:2024cv02564
Plaintiff:
Frances Fernandez and Cecille Nguyen
Defendant:
Favorite World, LLC d/b/a Shapermint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. The Estate of Randy Jordan et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Defendant:
Tarheel Realty, LLC, The Estate of Randy Jordan, National Civil, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Frances Fernandez et al v. Favorite World, LLC
as 8:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Frances Fernandez and Cecille Nguyen
Defendant:
Favorite World, LLC doing business as Shapermint Erroneously Sued As Favorite World, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Keen v. Cook et al
as 6:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
CeCil Keen
Defendant:
Darin Cook and DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. USA
as 5:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Brent Cecil Miller
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. Mark Hayes
as 24-6248
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
MARK J. HAYES, HOPE M. BLACKLEY, GAIL MOFFITT and others
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Marshals
as 24-6249
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARSHALS, 7th Judicial, Spartanburg, AGENT DILLION, 7th Judicial Parole Officer, WARDEN ROBERT MICHAEL, Stevenston, III and others
CONWELL v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH, RAY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CHARLES BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
