Cases 31 - 40 of 396
Chism v. Miami Correctional Facility
as 3:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Tayuan A Chism, Sr
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aliff et al v. Mayfield Consumer Products, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dustin Aliff, Roberta Brooks, Jeff Chism and others
Defendant:
Mayfield Consumer Products, LLC, Justin Bobbitt and Lorenzo H. Cash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Chism v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06400
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Chism
Defendant:
Menard, Inc., a foreign corporation d/b/a Menards and Menard, Inc. a foreign corporation doing business as Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chism v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Nathan H Chism
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Joseph Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Nathan Harold Chism
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luis R. Avalos v. Travon Tate et al
as 2:2022cv07848
Plaintiff:
Luis R. Avalos
Defendant:
Travon Tate, Tammy Chism and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Chism v. Arnold et al
as 3:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Melvin Chism, III
Defendant:
Steve Arnold, Aaron Guinn and White Pine Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chism v. Oakes et al
as 3:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Melvin Chism, III
Defendant:
Ricky Oakes, Jeff Coffey, Shelly Mannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHISM v. OOLEY
as 4:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CHISM
Defendant:
ALEX MICHAEL OOLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnathan Harper v. David Robinson, et al
as 22-16450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN SETH HARPER
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, DAVID PUTNAM, CRYSTAL THOMAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
