Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Meyers et al v. Catamount Marketing Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00551
Defendant:
Christopher Landis, Karen Landis, Concelium, LLC, d/b/a Liberty Tax and others
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Washington, Patricia Roberts and Dammione Meyers
Stewart v. Johnson et al
as 5:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryan Stewart
Defendant:
Edwina Johnson, Elizabeth Bowles, Tom Gramiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Imani et al v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00439
Defendant:
Melvin Lee Holden, City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Plaintiff:
Blair Imani, Akeem Muhammad, Raae Pollard and others
Interested Party:
James W Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Hiserote et al
as 6:2017cv01078
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jennifer Elise Hiserote, Jacob Mathias Sahlfeld and Christopher Bryan Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Torres v. Livingston et al
as 6:2017cv00196
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryan Torres
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, William Stephens, Kelvin Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan v. Inland Marine Services, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryan
Defendant:
Inland Marine Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Gaul v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv04022
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryan Gaul
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Christopher Ablett
as 16-16461
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BRYAN ABLETT
Ablett v. USA
as 3:2015cv04570
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Bryan Ablett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bryan v. The People of the State of NY et al
as 7:2014cv08305
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryan
Defendant:
The People of the State of NY and Adeel Mirza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
