Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,809
Valentinis-Dee v. McMannis et al
as 4:2024cv03943
Defendant: Trevon McMannis, Montgomery County Sheriff Dept, Brenda C Farhi and others
Plaintiff: James Valentinis-Dee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re Reginal Lee Davis
as 1:2024cv09951
Defendant: TITLES INSTITUTIONS PRISONS, KELLY TESTA, JUDGE NOEL L. HILLMAN and others
Plaintiff: KING REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONBO v. USA
as 1:2024cv01658
Plaintiff: DEE MONBO
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2833
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01814
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Carey et al
as 3:2024cv07131
Plaintiff: Mauricio Torres
Defendant: Dee Dee Carey, Cecilia Carey-Najee, Dee Dee Carey-Najee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 24-6197
Defendant: F. WILLIAMS, ENNIS-WRIGHT, "Q" and others
Plaintiff: KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
McQueen v. Wilson et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00634
Defendant: Curtis Washington, Rosalynn Wilson and Dee Dee Wilson
Plaintiff: Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdelaziz Hamze v. Roseana Demetria R. Singletary, et al
as 24-13263
Defendant: ROSEANA DEMETRIA R. SINGLETARY, KATHERINE DEE BURGIN, WILLIAM HALL and others
Plaintiff: ABDELAZIZ BILAL HAMZE
Sifuentes v. Prelesnik et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01044
Defendant: John Prelesnik, Valerie R. Newman, Micheal D. Carpenter and others
Plaintiff: RESTRICTED FILER David Angel Sifuentes, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?