Cases 31 - 40 of 196
Morris v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00517
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Morris
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens, Kay Ivey and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv10020
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., PFIZER INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GLORIA E. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keane v. Northland Tool & Equipment, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00212
Plaintiff:
Okuma America Corporation, Robert E. Morris Company, LLC, Mr. Nicholaus Keane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anculle et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Kraujalis, Priscilla A. Blackburn, Malibu K. Messer and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Kenneth Morris v. Warden, et al
as 18-12966
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH E. MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and WARDEN
Morris v. Harris Teeter Supermarkets Inc
as 2:2018cv01476
Plaintiff:
Ruth E Morris
Defendant:
Harris Teeter Supermarkets Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Morris et al
as 5:2018cv02408
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and Jessie IV James Davis
Defendant:
Maclyn L Morris, Mildred E Morris, Sequoia Management Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
In re: Kenneth Morris
as 18-11393
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH E. MORRIS
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Morris v. The New York Gaming Commission, et al
as 1:2018cv00384
Plaintiff:
Ainsworth E. Morris
Defendant:
The New York Gaming Commission, Mr. James Hass, Isabella Poss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris v. Ingram et al (MAG+)
as 1:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Morris
Defendant:
Lori Collier Ingram, LaDonna B. Spivey and Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
