Cases 31 - 40 of 148
League of Women Voters of MI, et al v. Ruth Johnson, et al
as 18-1437
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN, ROGER J. BRDAK, FREDERICK C. DURHAL, JR. and others
Defendant:
RUTH JOHNSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State
Appellant:
JACK BERGMAN, MIKE BISHOP, BILL HUIZENGA and others
League of Women Voters of Michigan et al v. Benson
as 2:2017cv14148
Plaintiff:
League of Women Voters of Michigan, William "Bill" J. Grasha, Roger J. Brdak and others
Defendant:
Ruth Johnson, Republican Congressional Delegation, Lee Chatfield and others
Petitioner:
William F. Carney, Jeff Cobb, Shelly Edgerton and others
Interested Party:
Robert LaBrant, Michigan Chamber of Commerce, Robert I. Schostak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Ellis et al
as 2:2017cv00480
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Ellis
Defendant:
V. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowell v. Loesch et al
as 2:2017cv00760
Plaintiff:
Denard Antwaun Rowell
Defendant:
Jeremy Loesch, N&S Towing Inc, Dodge County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Jamalu
as 2:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Ellis
Defendant:
Jeb Doctor Gr. Jamalu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Andrew E. Ellis v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2016cv09628
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Andrew E. Ellis
Washington v. Rivera et al
as 6:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
Akeem Washington
Defendant:
Shannon R. Rivera and Tina E. Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dameon Davis v. Curtis Walker, et al
as 16-4245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dameon Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Curtis Walker, Prosecuting Attorney, Mississippi County and Charles E. Ellis, Public Defender, Mississippi County
Davis v. Walker et al
as 3:2016cv00195
Plaintiff:
Dameon Davis
Defendant:
Curtis Walker and Charles E Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
