Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 324
Smith v. The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
as 23-304
Plaintiff: Jane Doe, In her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Tom Sawyer, a fictitious name, deceased, Jane Doe, In her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Tom Sawyer, a fictitious name, deceased, and Katherine Soulas, in her own right, as Representative of the Heirs, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Timothy Soulas, Deceased, on behalf of the Solatium claimants, including Katherine Soulas, Frederick Soulas, II, Ti
Plaintiff / Appellant: Raymond Anthony Smith, as Administrator of the Estate of George Eric Smith, deceased.
Defendant / Appellee: The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, The Taliban, Al Qaida/Islamic Army and others
Defendant: Saddam Hussein
Havlish v. Bin-Laden
as 23-258
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fiona Havlish, Russa Steiner, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of William Steiner, deceased, Clara Chirchirillo, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of Peter Chirchirillo and others
Defendant: Sheikh Usama Bin-Laden, The Taliban, Muhammad Omar and others
Appellee: Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Plaintiff: Jane Doe, In her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Tom Sawyer, a fictitious name, deceased and Katherine Soulas, in her own right, as Representative of the Heirs, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Timothy Soulas, Deceased, on behalf of the Solatium claimants, including Katherine Soulas, Frederick Soulas, II, Ti
Defendant / Appellee: The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Sheikh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Laden, AKA Osama Bin-Laden and Al Qaida/Islamic Army
Alford et al v. The NFL Player Disability & Survivor Benefit Plan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00358
Plaintiff: Jason Alford, Daniel Loper, Willis McGahee and others
Defendant: The NFL Player Disability & Survivor Benefit Plan, The NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan, The Bert Bell/ Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Mendoza, Jr. v. Smith, Jr et al
as 3:2023cv00070
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Saul Mendoza, Jr.
Defendant: Eric Smith, Jr, City of Richmond and Does 1 - 25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goddard et al v Jubilant Hollisterstier LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00004
Plaintiff: kevin goddard and eric smith
Defendant: jubilant hollisterstier, llc and Jubilant Hollisterstier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Smith v. Hill
as 0:2022cv02927
Plaintiff: Eric Smith
Defendant: James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Johnson, III v. Ron Haynes, et al
as 22-35885
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES L JOHNSON III
Defendant / Appellee: RON HAYNES, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center, ROB SCHREIBER, Correctional Program Manager, Stafford Creek Corrections Center, GINA PENROSE, Associate Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center and others
Sotelo v. City of Richmond et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv06475
Plaintiff: Jose Sotelo
Defendant: City of Richmond, Eric Smith Jr. and Karel Marecek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zimmermann et al v. Labish et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv12338
Plaintiff: Brian Zimmermann, Jamie Zimmermann and JPZ
Defendant: Scott Labish, Anthony Wickersham, Eric Smith and others
DeGruy v. Rjork et al
as 6:2022cv01379
Plaintiff: Omari Lateef DeGruy
Defendant: Rjork, Justin and Eric Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?