Cases 31 - 40 of 2,635
Save the Davis-Meeker Garry Oak v. Sullivan
as 3:2024cv05429
Defendant:
Debbie Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Save the Davis-Meeker Garry Oak
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 703 Migratory Bird Act
WILLIAMS v. TRUMBULL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
GARRY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TRUMBULL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Garry v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02901
Plaintiff:
Jacquelin Garry
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Recant v. Day et al
as 1:2024cv04117
Defendant:
Donna Recant, Paul Marks, Sargent Female NYC Police Dept 23rd Precinct and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Recant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busboom v. Morton Buildings, Inc.
as 4:2024cv03085
Counter Defendant:
Garry Busboom
Counter Claimant:
Morton Buildings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Save the Davis-Meeker Garry Oak v. Sullivan
as 3:2024cv05428
Defendant:
Debbie Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Save the Davis-Meeker Garry Oak
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 703 Migratory Bird Act
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Dees v. Zurlo
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNN DEES and ETHAN DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
JILLIAN KNOX, SAMUAL MAXWELL, EMILY WILLIAMS and others
Walker v. McFadden et al
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Walker
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden and Mecklenburg County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
