Cases 31 - 40 of 1,736
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Ware v. Boutin et al
as 9:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Khyrel Ware
Defendant:
Boutin, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holcomb v. Walmart Stores East I, LP
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Holcomb
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East I, LP doing business as Walmart #4590
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Holcomb v. Target Corporation
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Katheryn Holcomb
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Holcomb v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dean Alton Holcomb
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc., Nissan of Hendersonville, LLC., Dawud Talib Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tony Griffin v. Kurtis Holcomb
as 24-1371
Plaintiff:
Tony Anthony Griffin
Defendant:
Kurtis Holcomb, Officer, Pine Bluff Unit (Originally named Curtis Holcumb)
Paydhealth, LLC v. Holcombe
as 2:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Paydhealth, LLC
Defendant:
Dawn G Holcombe doing business as DGH Consulting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Zika v. Calvert et al
as 4:2023cv03249
Plaintiff:
Garry Zika
Defendant:
Christopher Calvert and Matthew Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Holcomb
as 2:2023cv00667
Petitioner:
William Gibson
Respondent:
Sheriff Rocky Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HILL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
JARMAH HILL
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB, BEN LALOUX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
