Cases 31 - 40 of 258
Dean v. Hoover Treated Wood Products Inc
as 4:2022cv00810
Plaintiff:
James Dean
Defendant:
Hoover Treated Wood Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11717
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2022cv00245
Petitioner:
JAMES DEAN JONES
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Underhile v. Ross et al
as 3:2022cv03037
Plaintiff:
James Dean Underhile
Defendant:
Sheriff Jim Ross, Administrator James Lookingbill, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENDRICK v. RECORDS ACCESS OFFICER et al
as 1:2022cv01789
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEAN KENDRICK
Defendant:
RECORDS ACCESS OFFICER, DIRECTOR, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
DORN v. BUDWICK et al
as 2:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAMES DEAN and THOMAS JAMES DORN
Defendant:
MARISSA BUDWICK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OTHER UNNAMED FBI AGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
USA v. James Cloud
as 22-30044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DEAN CLOUD
Dean #292046 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Bryson James Dean
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
as 2:2022cv14069
Plaintiff:
James Dean
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nichols v. Dean et al
as 2:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Gibreel H. Nichols
Defendant:
James Dean, Richard Chvala, Cynthia Ruth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
