Cases 31 - 40 of 2,020
US v. James Whisenant, Jr.
as 24-4074
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD WHISENANT, JR., a/k/a Wacky Weasel, a/k/a jimwizen@msn.com, a/k/a James E. Whisenant, Jr.
White v. United States Supreme Court et al
as 1:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
James Edward White
Defendant:
Supreme Court of the United States, United States House of Representatives, Executive Branch of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cox v. Drumwright et al
as 5:2023cv05217
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Corporal Drumwright, Lieutenant Atchley, John Doe Mail Log Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. USA
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
James Edward Russell, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sandford III v. Warden
as 9:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
James Edward Sandford, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
In re: James Moss
as 24-10185
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES EDWARD MOSS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. James Bess, III
as 23-14215
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARDS BESS, III
White v. Michigan, State of
as 1:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
James Edward White
Defendant:
Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lewis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
James Edward Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America, Correctional Officer C. Via, Correctional Officer P. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
