Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Jerkins v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv00483
Plaintiff:
Gladys Jerkins
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall et al v. Jones County Board of Commissioners et al
as 4:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Hall , Elaine Robinson-Strayhorn , Lindora Toudle and others
Defendant:
Jones County Board of Commissioners , Frank Emory , W. Michael Haddock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
C.E.O. OF CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SOLUTIONS v. HAYES et al
as 1:2016cv09480
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HAYES
Defendant:
C.E.O. OF CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SOLUTIONS, MEDICAL DIRECTOR JERKINS, PRACTITIONEER CATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waller v. Dubois et al
as 1:2016cv06697
Plaintiff:
Shakeel Qaudeer Waller
Defendant:
Carl DuBois, County of Orange, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Disability Act of 1990
Jerkins v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27247
Plaintiff:
Gladys E. Jerkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JERKINS v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66503
Defendant:
3M, COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, GOODRICH CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA PREYER JERKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Stovall v. Duncan et al
as 4:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Stovall
Defendant:
Bruce Duncan, Lisa Boyd, Kate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUNTRUST BANK v. WORLDWIDE PROPERTY, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv02356
Plaintiff:
SUNTRUST BANK
Defendant:
WORLDWIDE PROPERTY, LLC and FREDDIE JERKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Swain v. Bethune et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv01068
Plaintiff:
Willie Swain
Defendant:
Dr. Bethune, Dr. Webb, Nurse Flowrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
