Cases 31 - 40 of 35,343
Hicks v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Keith S Hicks
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Petersmark v. Burgess et al
as 4:2024cv11272
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Petersmark
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, J. Clouse, Jason Erway and others
ALWARD v. ELKTON FSL et al
as 3:2024cv00806
Petitioner:
Matthew Keith Alward
Respondent:
Elkton FSL and Brian Newell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
South et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert South, Edward W Allsman, David L Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MIRCHANDANI v. JEWELL et al
as 3:2024cv06091
Petitioner:
KEITH MIRCHANDANI
Respondent:
ANDREW JEWELL and KAYLLE JEWELL
Interested Party:
TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.
HOWARD v. USA
as 1:2024cv00412
Petitioner:
BYRON KEITH HOWARD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley, Dessey Cheers and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALWARD v. MDOC et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Petitioner:
Matthew Keith Alward and Matthew Keith Berry
Respondent:
Mdoc, Washtenaw County Court and Wayne County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Raniere
as 24-1285
Defendant:
KEITH RANIERE, NANCY SALZMAN, Vanguard and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
