Cases 31 - 40 of 384
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, RAHEEM ALEEM, OFFICER HERBIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON
as 1:2022cv00855
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17227
Plaintiff:
BRENT M KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones et al v. King et al
as 4:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Ysidro Renteria and William L. Jones Carr
Defendant:
Amber M. King, Chris H. Busse and Brandon W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Radford v. King et al
as 4:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Radford
Defendant:
Kiamera M King, Ballon, Quanica Bealer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tumbusch v. Spartanburg County Detention Center et al
as 4:2022cv01949
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Tumbusch
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Center, Spartanburg County, C. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
King et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran,
as 1:2022cv05193
Plaintiff:
Susan M King et.al
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran,
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Rindahl v. Malsam-Rysdon et al
as 4:2022cv04073
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Defendant:
Kim Malsam-Rysdon, Joan Adam, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
King v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. King
Defendant:
City of Portland and Brent Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pai et al v. Biden Jr. et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kaheana: Kathleen Kawale Pai and Keawe: Bradley Dean Mahina Pai
Defendant:
Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., Kamala Harris, Anthony J. Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
