Cases 31 - 40 of 1,820
Maddox v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq00270
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Keith Maddox
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eudaley v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Tracie Eudaley
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins, Ryan Wells, Ashley Lepold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Maddox v. Ruebart et al
as 2:2024cv00172
Petitioner:
Kimberly Maddox
Respondent:
William Ruebart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aigbekaen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Defendant:
United States of America, Kelly Baird, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeton v. Maddox (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant:
Andrew L. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Steven Blackmon and Tyrone Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Winston L. Harrison
Defendant:
Bruce Maddox, Marvin W. Wiggins, Erica K. Kemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GEICO v. Aparicio et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
GEICO
Defendant:
Michael Aparicio, Maddox, Inc. and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
