Cases 31 - 40 of 135
Sanders v. Headley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00793
Defendant:
A. Murphey, M. Lanier, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
George J. Sanders, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv01760
Plaintiff:
JACOB MURPHEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00174
Plaintiff:
John Boatfield, Bruce Smiley, Lamont Johnson and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, State of Tennessee, Tennessee Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noco Company v. Murphey
as 1:2019cv00114
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Melissa Murphey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA et al v. ADVANCED BUILDERS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01275
Defendant:
MICHELLE T HERRON, LOUIS RUSCITTO, LISA M. MURPHEY and others
Plaintiff:
LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA and LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Clarksdale Public Utilities Commission et al v. The City of Clarksdale, Mississippi et al
as 4:2018cv00164
Plaintiff:
Dr. James Humber, Freddie Davis, George Miller and others
Defendant:
The Board of Mayor and Commissioners of the City of Clarksdale, Mississippi, Bo Plunk, The City of Clarksdale, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphey v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00527
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Murphey
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hileman v. Internet Wines & Spirits CO. et al
as 4:2018mc00340
Movant:
Mandy Murphey
Defendant:
Internet Wines & Spirits CO. and George Randall
Plaintiff:
Jaimie Hileman
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Noah Kirk v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2018cv03651
Defendant:
Joel Barnett, Joe Dempsey, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Noah Kirk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
