Cases 31 - 40 of 72,736
Catlett v. West et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Angela Catlett
Defendant:
Mallory West, James Carter, David West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Blanchard et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
Patrick Dean Blanchard, Charles Michael Dickens, James A. Segars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Morris et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kennin Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Deputy, Mr. Morris, Deputy, Mr. A. Wood, Deputy, Mr. Stearns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00778
Petitioner:
Barrett N. Duncan
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Loaf N Jug et al
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gray, II
Defendant:
Loaf N Jug and E.G. Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
City of Moca, Puerto Rico et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 3:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
City of Moca, Puerto Rico and Corteva, Inc.
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company,, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Natasha Newberry
as 24-4297
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NATASHA NICOLE NEWBERRY, a/k/a Natasha N. Newberry
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 24-3465
Plaintiff:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
JAMES WALKER, N. GRANNIS, S FLORY and others
Romero v. N F I P DIRECT
as 6:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Aaron Romero
Defendant:
N F I P Direct
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
