Cases 31 - 40 of 16,230
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Mathena et al
as 7:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Derrick Edwards
Defendant:
Randall C. Mathena, Lois Fegan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annis v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jay Michael Annis
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tafari v. Rucker, et al.
as 24-2842
Plaintiff:
RAS HEZEKIAH TAFARI
Defendant:
YVETTE RUCKER, JULIE RANDALL, GARRY MOLER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ledford v. Hensley et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Randall Eugene Ledford
Defendant:
Mike Hensley, Walmart Unicoi, Aaron Embler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sladek v. Bank of America, NA, et al
as 24-1181
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SLADEK
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NA, a North Carolina corporation, U.S. BANK, a Minnesota corporation, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, a Utah corporation and others
RICHARDS v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00745
Petitioner:
RANDALL RICHARDS
Respondent:
DONALD EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
