Cases 31 - 40 of 4,607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Morales v. Bierly et al
as 1:2024cv01081
Defendant:
Major Reed, Davidsom, CO Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00753
Petitioner:
Deandre Laney Rodgers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5715
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Weems v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2024cv00764
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rodger C. Weems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
CHAMBERS v. BROWN et al
as 1:2024cv00562
Defendant:
MR. COUZZI, MR. STULTZ, MR. T. KLUK and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ekaterra v. Rodgers
as 2:2024mc00011
Defendant:
Ekaterra doing business as Lipton Teas & Infusions and Maya Rodgers
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
Martin v. Rodgers
as 5:2024cv00636
Respondent:
David Rodgers
Petitioner:
Dennis Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
(PS) Wilkinson v. El Dorado Co Health and Humans Services Agency et al
as 2:2024cv01742
Defendant:
Leslie Griffith, Kaitlyn Devine, El Dorado County Health and Humans Services Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly G. Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Anderson v. Hunt et al
as 3:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Psych Doctor Jean Doe #2, Chief of Security John Doe #2, Major Unknown Williams and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Levonzel Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
