Cases 31 - 40 of 40,924
Taylor v. Bank of America Corporation
as 1:2024cv03975
Plaintiff:
Paula Taylor
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Taylor v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-3114
Petitioner:
CAMERON LEEZELL TAYLOR
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, KRIS MAYES, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, DAVID SHINN, ADOC Director and others
Porco v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65562
Plaintiff:
Taylor Porco
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pickens v. Taylor
as 2:2024cv00596
Petitioner:
Demetrus Pickens
Respondent:
Warden Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAMARITANO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2024cv04102
Plaintiff:
JASON SAMARITANO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GLENN GRANT, CRISTEN DARRIGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Bolton et al
as 6:2024cv03148
Plaintiff:
Gary Taylor
Defendant:
Taylor Bolton, Steven Hartman and City of Springfield, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jason Samaritano v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 24-1889
Plaintiff:
JASON SAMARITANO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GLENN GRANT, in his official capacity, CRISTEN DARRIGO, Judge, NewJersey Superior Court, Law Division, Criminal Part. Cumberland County, in his official capacity and others
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
