Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Nathaniel Dunn v. Edmonds, et al
as 11-14384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL THOMAS DUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMONDS, Correctional Officer, RODRIGUEZ, Warden of Care & Treatment, PARK, Dentist and others
Belcher v. Dunn
as 6:2011cv03317
Petitioner:
Randy K Belcher
Respondent:
Thomas Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunn v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 5:2011cv00712
Petitioner:
Thomas Dunn
Respondent:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Dunn v. Triton Yacht Sales, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00185
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Dunn, Jr.
Defendant:
Triton Yacht Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Dunn v. Hartman and Tyner, Inc.
as 0:2010cv61172
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dunn
Defendant:
Hartman and Tyner, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Dunn v. Marin County et al
as 3:2010cv00969
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dunn
Defendant:
Marin County, Marin County Board of Supervisors, Marin County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dunn et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2010cv01921
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dunn and Michaela Dunn
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Bock v. Gold
as 10-514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gordon Bock
Defendant:
Alex Anlyan, Department of Corrections, Cognitive Self-Change Facilitator
Defendant - Appellee:
Steven Gold, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, Janice Ryan, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Corrections, Raymond Flum, Director of Offender Classification and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Daniel Gatson v. State of NJ, et al
as 09-4731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GATSON
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANTHONY HANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ, ANNE MILGRAM, Attorney General, Individually and in her official Capacity, COUNTY OF SOMERSET and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
