Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Krueger v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00058
Defendant:
New Directions Northwest, Inc., Cynthia Flynn, Sue Washburn and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Krueger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ENDRE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv03372
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY ANDREW ENDRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Taylor v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2018cv02371
Defendant:
Jesse L Jansma, Charles R Price, II and Phoenix, City of
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roper v. Yanni
as 3:2018cv00489
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Roper
Defendant:
Philip Yanni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Falls Lake National Insurance Company et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2018cv00066
Defendant:
El Roi Construction, Inc., Luis Antonio Gamboa, Margie Guerra Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Falls Lake National Insurance Company and Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Kellis v. Atencio et al
as 3:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Kellis
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Shannon Cluney, Randy E Blades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Timothy Fugit
as 17-7453
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY ANDREW FUGIT
Yeigh v. West Virginia Federal Courts Systems
as 2:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Yeigh
Defendant:
West Virginia Federal Courts Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Timothy Crane v. Barbara Davenport, et al
as 17-1681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY CRANE, named as Timothy Andrew Lee Crane #779001
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA DAVENPORT, Mental Health Medication Provider, A. MARSHALL, Psychologist - II, BRIAN MAJERCZYK, Mental Health Unit Chief and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-15576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
