Cases 41 - 50 of 472
Starnes v. TA Operating LLC
as 3:2022cv03532
Plaintiff:
Eric Starnes
Defendant:
TA Operating LLC doing business as TravelCenters of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Strategic Partner LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02589
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Strategic Partner LLC, SP National Management LLC, Strategic Partner TN LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
C.C. v. Colston et al
as 7:2022cv02356
Plaintiff:
C.C.
Defendant:
Joshua L Colston, Second Chance Emergency Placement Inc, Naran Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FNTV, LLC v. Starnes Media Group LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04042
Plaintiff:
FNTV, LLC
Defendant:
Starnes Media Group LLC and Todd Starnes
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Sharifi v. Hamm et al
as 5:2022cv00826
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
John Hamm, Hon. Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharifi v. Hamm et al
as 1:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
John Hamm, Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Starnes et al
as 3:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Nathan R Starnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STARNES v. USA
as 1:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
HOWARD R. STARNES, II
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
