Cases 41 - 50 of 180
Robinson v. Murphy Exploration & Production Company
as 4:2018cv01456
Plaintiff:
Pamela B Robinson
Defendant:
Murphy Exploration & Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Katherine Robinson v. Chesapeake Bank of Maryland
as 18-1473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE B. ROBINSON and DANA B. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE BANK OF MARYLAND and PROCTOR FINANCIAL, INC.
Cardenas v. Powers et al
as 4:2017cv05203
Petitioner:
Leopoldo Cuevas Cardenas
Respondent:
Patricia D Powers and Douglas B Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Top Tier, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01241
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Matthews
Defendant:
Fredric B. Robinson and Top Tier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 Fair Labor Standards Act - Maximum Hours
Katherine B. Robinson v. Chesapeake Bank of Maryland
as 17-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE B. ROBINSON and DANA B. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE BANK OF MARYLAND and PROCTOR FINANCIAL, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Robinson v. Jackson
as 2:2017cv11400
Petitioner:
Christopher B. Robinson
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
MCBRIDE v. KLLM TRANSPORT SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02601
Plaintiff:
EDELEMIRA MCBRIDE
Defendant:
KLLM TRANSPORT SERVICES, LLC , TED B ROBINSON , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cross_claimant:
TED B ROBINSON and KLLM TRANSPORT SERVICES, LLC
Cross_defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC-XYZ CORPS.
Counter_claimant:
TED B ROBINSON and KLLM TRANSPORT SERVICES, LLC
Counter_defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC-XYZ CORPS.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Katherine B. Robinson v. Chesapeake Bank of Maryland
as 17-1217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE B. ROBINSON and DANA B. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE BANK OF MARYLAND and PROCTOR FINANCIAL, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
