Cases 41 - 50 of 26,457
WILLIAMS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BELLO, BAKER, AKENADI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Deandrae Deas
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keller North America, Inc. v. D'Ambra Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Keller North America, Inc. and Hayward Baker, Inc.
Defendant:
D'Ambra Construction Co., Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Baker v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Seminole County)
as 6:2024cv00808
Petitioner:
Ferdell Baker
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce #211005 v. Snow et al
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Perry Pierce #211005
Defendant:
Unknown Snow, D. Baker and Unknown Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Taylor et al v. EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ralph Taylor and Lloyd Baker
Defendant:
EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC and Tug Hill Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Baker v. Poe
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian S. Poe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
